Wiand v. Mason et al
| Burton W. Wiand |
| Mark Mason and Clarisse Mason |
| 8:2010cv02146 |
| September 27, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Pinellas |
| James D. Whittemore |
| Thomas G. Wilson |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 754 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER adopting 71 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and incorporating it by reference; the objections of both parties [73, 74] be overruled; the Receiver's motion for partial summary judgment [22 be granted; the Clerk is directed to enter judgment for the Receiver and against the Mason Defendants in the amount of $36,661.31; the Receiver's motion to strike report of Defendants' designated expert, Harold McFarland, and to Preclude His Testimony at Trial 54 be denied; the defend ants' motion for summary judgment relating to statute of limitations 48 be denied; and the Receiver's request for pre-judgment interest be denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case and to terminate any other pending motions. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 1/25/2013. (SN)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER adopting and incorporating by reference 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 15 MOTION to dismiss complaint filed by Mark Mason, Clarisse Mason ; the objection of the defendants be overruled; and the motion to dismiss 15 be denied. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 4/10/2012. (SN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
