Wigfall et al v. Sodexo, Inc. et al
| Melissa Wigfall, Connie Daniels, Genethel Danielle Pye, Anthony Mills, Markis Flanders, Malisa Butler, Virginia Larry, Melissa Worley and Kimberly Harris |
| Sodexo, Inc., Rich Vogel and Saint Leo University, Incorporated |
| 8:2010cv02232 |
| October 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Pasco |
| Susan C Bucklew |
| Thomas G. Wilson |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
ORDER granting 103 Motion for attorneys' fees and costs. Saint Leo is entitled to recover $181,216.50 in attorneys' fees and $10,314.27 in costs from Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 9/5/2012. (LSC)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER granting 64 Motion for summary judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant Saint Leo University, Incorporated, and against Plaintiffs Melissa Wigfall, Connie Daniels, Genethel Danielle Pye, Anthony Mills, Malisa Butler, Virginia Larry, and Melissa Worley, and to close this case. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 3/6/2012. (LSC)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 34 Motion to consolidate cases. On or before November 4, 2011, Plaintiffs are directed to file a Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 10/18/2011. (LSC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
