Garden Fresh Distribution Service, Inc. v. Lucas Brothers Mushrooms, Inc. et al
Garden Fresh Distribution Service, Inc. |
Orfanel Lucas, Jesus V. Lucas and Lucas Brothers Mushrooms, Inc. |
8:2010cv02756 |
December 9, 2010 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Tampa Office |
Broward |
Elizabeth A. Kovachevich |
Mark A. Pizzo |
Agricultural Acts |
07 U.S.C. ยง 0499 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 ORDER granting 54 Motion for attorney fees. The intervening plaintiffs motion for interest, attorneys fees, and cost (Doc. 54) be granted and the plaintiff is awarded interest in the amount of $19,113.00 and prejudgment interest, attorneys fees and costs in the amount of $6,137.89 for a total of $25.250.89. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment for the intervening plaintiff and close this case. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 10/5/2011. (SN) |
Filing 56 ORDER granting 51 Motion for attorney fees and the plaintiff is awarded interest in the amount of $21,320.91 and attorneys fees and costs in the amount of $11,392.90 for a total of $32,713.81. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment for the plaintiff. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 9/20/2011. (SN) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting 2 Motion for temporary restraining order. See order for details. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign the motion for preliminary injunction to the assigned magistrate judge. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 12/9/2010. (SN) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.