Bennett Engineering Group, Inc. et al v. ASHE Industries, Inc. et al
| Bennett Engineering Group, Inc. and Lawrence E. Bennett |
| G. Maurice Blakeman, ASHE Industries, Inc., Suncoast Architecture & Engineering, LLC and Clark H. Scherer, Jr. |
| 8:2011cv00493 |
| November 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Volusia |
| Mark A. Pizzo |
| James S. Moody |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
60-DAY ORDER OF DISMISSAL: All pending motions are denied as moot. Clerk shall close the file. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 3/12/2012. (LN)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER granting 82 Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendant ASHE INDUSTRIES, INC. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 2/15/2012. (LN)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Certain Counts of Amended Complaint, or, in the Alternative, For More Definite Statement 37 is DENIED. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading within 20 days of this Order. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 8/11/2011. (LN)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting 27 Motion to Change Venue; denying as moot 38 Motion to Strike; granting 39 Motion to Change Venue; granting 22 Motion to Reassign Divisions; granting 23 Motion to Change Venue; and directing Clerk to transfer case to the Tampa Division and to close the file. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 3/8/2011. (EK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
