Ameritox, LTD. v. Millennium Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ameritox, LTD.
Defendant: Millennium Laboratories, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2011cv00775
Filed: April 8, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Tampa Office
County: Hillsborough
Presiding Judge: Susan C Bucklew
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. McCoun
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 703 ORDER denying 696 Motion to stay enforcement of costs or to amend the Magistrate Judge's cost determination. The Magistrate Judge's Order on costs 693 is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order of the Court. Millennium's Motion for a Temporary Stay 697 is GRANTED, and Millennium must post a supersedeas bond for the costs award within 14 days of this Order. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 3/13/2015. (JD)
September 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 686 ORDER denying 662 Motion for Permanent Injunction. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 9/15/2014. (JD)
September 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 684 ORDER denying 654 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; granting in part and denying in part 655 Motion for New Trial or Reduce Punitive Damages. The Clerk is directed to enter a second amended judgment that reduces the punitive damages award from $12,000,000 to $8,505,000. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 9/12/2014. (JD)
May 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 558 ORDER granting 415 Motion to exclude Williams' survey and opinions. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 5/29/2014. (JD)
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 449 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 328 Motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 5/6/2014. (JD)
May 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 448 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 334 Motion to exclude Dr. Cantor. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 5/5/2014. (JD)
April 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 428 ORDER denying 404 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 4/30/2014. (JD)
April 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 398 ORDER granting in part, denying in part, and deferring in part 328 Millennium's Motion for summary judgment; denying 356 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 4/14/2014. (JD)
January 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 327 ORDER denying 320 Motion to preclude Millennium from filing second motion for summary judgment - see Order for details. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 1/14/14. (JD)
January 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 178 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 137 Motion to dismiss. See order for details. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 1/10/13. (JD)
November 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 170 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 141 Motion to file document under seal. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 11/14/2012. (JD)
August 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 132 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 101 Motion to dismiss; denying as moot 120 Motion to modify; denying as moot 123 Motion to Seal Document ; denying 131 Motion for leave to file. See order for details. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 8/23/2012. (JMM)
May 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 103 Motion to stay discovery. Millennium's Motion to Stay Discovery is GRANTED to the extent that discovery is stayed until the Court rules on Millennium's motion to dismiss. Otherwise, the motion to stay is DENIED. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 5/16/2012. (JMM)
May 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER denying 100 Motion to seal. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 5/4/2012. (JD)
March 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER denying without prejudice 76 Motion to strike; denying without prejudice 76 Motion to dismiss; granting 82 Motion to consolidate cases. Case number 8:12-cv-219-T-24-MAP is hereby consolidated with Case number 8:11-cv-775-T-24-TBM. Case number 8:11-cv-775-T-24-TBM will be the lead case number, and all further pleadings are to be filed therein. By April 9, 2012, Ameritox is directed to file one final amended complaint, which includes all counts and allegations it intends to raise in this matter. The Court will not permit further amendments without good cause. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 3/28/2012. (JMM)
January 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER granting 20 Motion to dismiss. Counts I and IV of Ameritox's Amended Complaint are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If Ameritox intends to amend its complaint as to Counts I and IV, it is directed to do so on or before January 23, 2012. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 1/6/2012. (JMM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ameritox, LTD. v. Millennium Laboratories, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ameritox, LTD.
Represented By: Richard H. Martin
Represented By: Margaret Diane Mathews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Millennium Laboratories, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?