Sterbenz et al v. Anderson
Plaintiff: Christopher A. Sterbenz and Jolanta Sterbenz
Defendant: Lois N. Anderson
Case Number: 8:2011cv01159
Filed: May 25, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Tampa Office
County: Pinellas
Presiding Judge: Virginia M. Hernandez Covington
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. McCoun
Nature of Suit: Torts to Land
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 153 ORDER: Defendant Lois N. Anderson's Motion to Amend Judgment to Reflect Setoff 147 is DENIED and Anderson's Motion for New Trial 150 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 3/28/2013. (MEB)
November 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 132 ORDER: Plaintiff's Daubert Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Randolph Blaine 93 is denied;Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Limit Defendant's Theory of the Case and Evidence to that Which She Disclosed in Discovery 94 is denied; an d Plaintiff's Motion for an Order Requiring Defendant to Reimburse Kenneth Teebagy, P.E. 97 is granted as unopposed. Defendant is ordered to reimburse Mr. Teebagy's fees and costs in the amount of $1,668.96 on or before November 16, 2012. The Court defers ruling on Defendant's Motion for Determination of Spoliation of Evidence and Appropriate Sanctions 92 until trial;Defendant's Motion in Limine to Preclude Cumulative and Unreliable Testimony 95 is denied; Defenda nt's Motion in Limine Regarding Plaintiff's Claimed Lost Wages Due to the Negligence of Defendant 98 is granted; with the caveat explained herein, Defendant's Motion in Limine Regarding Mrs. Anderson's Claimed "Memory Loss" 99 is denied; Defendant's Motion in Limine to Prohibit Plaintiff from Calling Christian Shallo as a Witness at the Trial of this Matter 100 is denied; and Defendant's Motion in Limine to Require Plaintiff to Elect his Damage Remedy Prior to the Trial of this Matter 101 is denied. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 11/2/2012. (MEB)
October 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER denying 76 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Late-Filed Answer to the First Amended Complaint, denying 64 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, and denying as moot 72 Defendant's Request for Oral Argument on Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 10/11/2012. (MEB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sterbenz et al v. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lois N. Anderson
Represented By: Michael Kraft
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher A. Sterbenz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jolanta Sterbenz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?