Crispell et al v. Florida Department of Children and Families et al
| Bradford D. Crispell and Virginia Madden-Crispell |
| Paramedics Plus LLC, Jim Coats, Carl Weinrich, Linda Rotz, Julie Bastian, Danielle A. Jackson, A. Dansler, Andrea Lancaster, Laurie Crawford, Florida Department of Children and Families, Children's Home Society of Florida Crisis Nursery, Pinellas County Sheriff's Office, Youth and Family Alternatives Inc., Sarasota Family Young Men's Christian Association Inc. and Gregory Handsel |
| 8:2011cv01527 |
| July 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Pasco |
| Elizabeth A. Jenkins |
| James S. Moody |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
ORDER: This cause is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear their own attorney's fees and costs. All liens and subrogated interests are to be paid by Plaintiffs out of the proceeds of the settlement made in this case. All pending motions are denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 12/6/2012. (LN)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER: Defendant Children's Home Society of Florida's Motion to Dismiss 94 is granted in part and denied in part. Count I is not dismissed. Count II is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiffs may amend Count II within 14 days of this Order if they have facts supporting this claim as stated herein. If Plaintiffs fail to amend Count II within 14 days, CHSF shall file an answer to Count I only within 14 days of the expiration of Plaintiffs' time to amend. Paragraphs 10, 13, 16(p), and 23 of the Second Amended Complaint are stricken. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 8/20/2012. (LN)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER: The Motion to Dismiss Submitted by Defendant Florida Department of Children and Families 70 is granted. All counts against this Defendant are dismissed, without prejudice. The Motion to Dismiss Jointly Submitted by Defendants Sarasota Fam ily Young Men's Christian Association, Inc. and Carl Weinrich 60 is granted. All counts against these Defendants are dismissed, without prejudice. The Motion to Dismiss Submitted by Defendant Children's Home Society of Florida 62 is g ranted in part, and denied in part, as stated herein. To the extent that Bradford Crispell and Virginia Madden-Crispell plead individual negligence claims against Defendant CHS, such claims are dismissed, without prejudice. TMC's negligence cl aim against Defendant CHS, brought on his behalf by his adoptive parents Bradford Crispell and Virginia Madden-Crispell, is not dismissed. Count VIII against this Defendant is dismissed, without prejudice. In addition, the Court hereby strikes para graphs 76 (a), (d), (e), and (f) from the Amended Complaint. The Motion to Dismiss Jointly Submitted by Defendants Youth and Family Alternatives, Inc., Andrea Lancaster, Laurie Crawford, and Linda Rotz 64 is granted. All counts against these Defe ndants are dismissed, without prejudice. The Motion to Dismiss Jointly Submitted by Defendants Pinellas County Sheriff's Office, Jim Coats, Gregory Handsel, and Julie Bastian 65 is granted. All counts against said Defendants are dismissed, without prejudice. Plaintiffs may replead their Complaint within 20 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 2/24/2012. (LN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
