Brivik v. Law et al
| Mark Brivik |
| Claudia Law, John Murray, Steve Murray, Joseph Russo, Richard Zimmerman, Ronald Carr, Andre Panet-Raymond and Abraham Smajovits |
| 8:2011cv02101 |
| September 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Manatee |
| Virginia M. Hernandez Covington |
| Thomas G. Wilson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
181
ORDER: Defendant Steve Murray's Renewed Motion for Award of Costs 175 is GRANTED in the amount of $613.00 but is otherwise DENIED. Defendant Richard Zimmerman's Renewed Motion for Award of Costs 178 is DENIED. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 4/18/2014. (KAK)
|
|
Filing
174
ORDER: Defendant Richard Zimmerman's Amended Renewed Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees and Costs 168 , Defendant Steve Murrary's Renewed Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees and Costs 169 , and Defendant Ronald Carr's Ren ewed Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees and Costs 172 are DENIED as to Attorney's Fees. The Court directs Brivik and the cost-seeking Defendants to confer regarding the costs in an attempt to resolve the issue without Court intervention . If those negotiations prove unsuccessful, each of the cost-seeking Defendants may file a Bill of Costs, accompanied by a legal memorandum, by March 14, 2014, to which Brivik may respond by March 28, 2014. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 3/3/2014. (KAK)
|
|
Filing
141
ORDER: Defendants Murray and Carr's dispositive motions 102 105 are GRANTED to the extent that this case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). Defendant Zimmerman's Motion for Summary Judgment 109 is DENIED AS MOOT. P laintiff's Motion to Strike Zimmerman's reply brief 140 , filed October 4, 2012, is further DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment in favor of Steve Murray, Ronald Carr, and Richard Zimmerman and against Mark Brivik. Thereafter, the Clerk is directed to terminate all pending deadlines and motions and CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 10/5/2012. (CAC)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER: Defendants John Murray and Abraham Smajovits are dismissed from this action without prejudice. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 10/1/2012. (KAK)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider and/or for Leave to File an Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 15 and 60(b) 87 is DENIED. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/23/2012. (KAK)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER: Defendant Officer Claudia Law's Motion to Dismiss and/or Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 32 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's case against Officer Claudia Law is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This action shall remain pending as between Plaintiff and the remaining Defendants. Plaintiff's Motion to Stay the Entry of Judgment in favor of Officer Law 64 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 4/5/2012. (KAK)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER: Officer Claudia Law's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Unauthorized Amended Complaint 63 is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to strike the Amended Complaint 57 . Plaintiff may re-file the Amended Complaint, absent complaint counts against Officer Law, by April 12, 2012. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 4/3/2012. (KAK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
