Luxottica Retail North America Inc. v. George L. Haffner Enterprises, Inc. et al
| Luxottica Retail North America Inc. |
| George L. Haffner Enterprises, Inc., George L. Haffner and Gail Mabry |
| 8:2011cv02433 |
| October 26, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Thomas B. McCoun |
| Steven D. Merryday |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
PERMANENT INJUNCTION and ORDER granting in part 25 --motion for default judgment; directing the Clerk to ENTER JUDGMENT (1) for the plaintiff and against the defendants George Haffner Enterprises, Inc., George Haffner, and Gail Mabry, jointly and severally, for $72,577.16 and (2) for the plaintiff and against the defendants George Haffner Enterprises, Inc., and George Haffner, jointly and severally, for $7,925.83. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 4/23/2012. (BK)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 18 --motion for default/motion to strike; denying as moot 18 --motion to strike; granting default; directing the Clerk to ENTER DEFAULT under Rule 55(a) against George L. Haffner and Gail Mabry. Upon motion for default judgment, a hearing on damages will be scheduled. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 12/16/2011. (BK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
