Lumpuy v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
Elieser Lumpuy |
Scottsdale Insurance Company |
8:2011cv02455 |
October 28, 2011 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Tampa Office |
Polk |
Susan C Bucklew |
Mark A. Pizzo |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 177 THIRD AMENDED JUDGMENT in favor of Elieser Lumpuy against Scottsdale Insurance Company. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 8/30/2013. (JNB) |
Filing 176 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 148 Motion for Attorney Fees. The Clerk is directed to amend the Second Amended Judgment 154 to add that Plaintiff is awarded $6,059.60 in costs and $151,022.50 in attorneys fees, as well as add that prejudgment interest and post-judgment interest shall accrue on the attorneys' fee award as of April 25, 2013 at the statutory rates. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 8/29/2013. (JD) |
Filing 153 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 136 Motion to Reduce Judgment; granting 140 Motion to Add Prejudgment Interest; denying 145 Motion for New Trial. The Clerk is directed to amend the amended judgment 133 to reflect a total award of $145,152.62 in damages, plus $12,715.92 in prejudgment interest. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 6/14/2013. (JD) |
Filing 141 ORDER denying 138 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 5/22/2013. (JD) |
Filing 93 ORDER denying 69 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine; denying 70 Defendant's 6th Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 71 Defendant's 5th Motion in Limine; denying 72 Defendant's 4th Motion in Limine; denyin g 73 Defendant's 3rd Motion in Limine; granting 74 Defendant's 2nd Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 75 Defendant's 1st Motion in Limine; denying 76 Defendant's Motion to Exclude Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 4/25/2013. (JD) |
Filing 65 ORDER denying 57 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 4/4/2013. (JD) |
Filing 56 ORDER denying 41 Plaintiff's Motion for summary judgment; denying 54 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Reply; denying 28 Defendant's Motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 2/8/2013. (JD) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting 3 Motion to stay; granting 4 Motion to strike. The Clerk is directed to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case pending the completion of the neutral evaluation process. Plaintiff is directed to file a notice informing the Court of the conclusion of the neutral evaluation process within 14 days after its completion. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 11/30/11. (JD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lumpuy v. Scottsdale Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Elieser Lumpuy | |
Represented By: | Joshua E. Burnett |
Represented By: | Matthew L. Wilson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Scottsdale Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Andrew Peter Rock |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.