Thornton v. City of St. Petersburg, Florida
| Sean Thornton |
| City of St. Petersburg, Florida and James Dean Large |
| 8:2011cv02765 |
| December 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Pinellas |
| Thomas G. Wilson |
| James S. Moody |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER dismissing case with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorney's fees and costs. All pending motions are denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 10/31/2012. (LN)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER: Defendant James Dean Large's Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative Dispositive Motion for Summary Judgment 30 is DENIED. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 8/1/2012. (LN)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER: Defendant James Dean Large's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint 5 , construed as a motion for judgment on the pleadings, is denied in part, and granted in part. Defendant City of St. Petersburg, Florida's Motion to Dismi ss Plaintiff's Complaint 15 is denied in part, and granted in part. Counts III and IV of Plaintiff Thornton's Complaint are dismissed, without prejudice. Count V of Plaintiff Thornton's Complaint is dismissed, with prejudice. Plaintiff Thornton may replead his Complaint (with the exception of Count V) within 20 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 6/8/2012. (LN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
