Federal Insurance Company v. Lazzara Yacht Corporation et al
| Federal Insurance Company |
| Lazzara Yacht Corporation and Caterpillar, Inc. |
| 8:2011cv02834 |
| December 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Hillsborough |
| Virginia M Hernandez Covington |
| Thomas G Wilson |
| Marine Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1333 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ENDORSED ORDER dismissing case with prejudice pursuant to the parties' Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice #18. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 9/19/2012. (MEB)
|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Federal Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Skipp, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 17
ENDORSED ORDER: On the basis of the notice of settlement, this cause is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice and subject to the right of the parties, within SIXTY (60) days of the date hereof, to submit a stipulated form of final order or judgment, or request an extension of time, should they so choose or for any party to move to reopen the action, upon good cause being shown. After that SIXTY (60) day period, however, without further order, this dismissal shall be deemed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate any previously scheduled deadlines and pending motions, and administratively close the case pending further Order. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 7/17/2012. (MEB)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Settlement by Federal Insurance Company (Skipp, Jonathan) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 14 Order to show cause by Federal Insurance Company. (Skipp, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 14
ENDORSED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to Federal Insurance Company. A review of this file shows that no Case Management Report has been filed by the parties within the time prescribed in Local Rule 3.05. Accordingly, if the Plaintiff, Federal Insurance Company, is still interested in prosecuting this action against the Defendants, the Plaintiff is directed to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by July 17, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to Local Rule 3.10. Failure to do so may result in this action being dismissed without further notice. Show Cause Response due by 7/17/2012. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 7/3/2012. (LYB)
|
| Filing 13 ANSWER and affirmative defenses with Jury Demand to #5 Amended complaint by Caterpillar, Inc..(Waterway, Kenneth) |
|
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER granting #11 defendant's Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to the amended complaint. Defendant's response due on or before May 18, 2012. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/9/2012. (MEB)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for extension of time to file answer or otherwise plead re #5 Amended complaint by Caterpillar, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Davant, Charles) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 6 OrderOrder to show cause filed by Federal Insurance Company. (Skipp, Jonathan) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Caterpillar, Inc. Identifying Other Affiliate State Street Corporation for Caterpillar, Inc... (Davant, Charles) |
| Filing 8 **INCORRECT EVENT; COUNSEL NOTIFIED TO REFILE** MOTION to extend time to File Response to Amended Complaint by Caterpillar, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Davant, Charles) Modified on 5/8/2012 (JLH). |
| Filing 7 RETURN of service executed on April 17, 2012 by Federal Insurance Company as to Caterpillar, Inc.. (Skipp, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff filed its complaint on December 23, 2011. A review of the file reveals that Plaintiff has not made service of the summons and the complaint upon the Defendant within 120 days after the filing of the complaint as required by Rule 4(m), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by May 10, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely effect service of process. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 4/26/2012. (MEB)
|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Caterpillar, Inc. filed by Federal Insurance Company. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Federal Insurance Company.(Skipp, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 4
ENDORSED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Upon review of the file, the Court finds that, Daniel S. Marcotte, Esq. is not admitted to practice in the Middle District of Florida. Therefore, it is ORDERED that within eleven (11) days of the date of this Order, Attorney Marcotte shall show cause, in writing, why his appearance should not be stricken. Failure to respond to this order will result in counsels appearance being stricken from the record without further notice from the Court. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 2/14/2012. (JS)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2 (LS) |
| Filing 2 Summons issued as to Caterpillar, Inc., Lazzara Yacht Corporation. (DMS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Caterpillar, Inc., Lazzara Yacht Corporation (Filing fee $350 receipt number TPA8927) filed by Federal Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (DMS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
