Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Renaissance Arts and Education, Inc. et al
| Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor |
| Renaissance Arts and Education, Inc., William Jones and Charles W. Jones |
| 8:2012cv00514 |
| March 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Steven D. Merryday |
| Mark A. Pizzo |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 651 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 93 Defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law or, alternatively, motion for new trial or remittitur and denying 102 Defendants' motion for leave to file a reply. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter an amended judgment ordering Plaintiff to recover $0 in punitive damages from Defendant Charles Jones and $0 in punitive damages from Defendant Renaissance Arts and Education, Inc. Otherwise, the judgment remains unchanged. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Pizzo on 2/3/2014. (AS)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER. For the reasons outlined in the attached order, I adopt the jury's advisory verdict. Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment for the Secretary and against Defendants as stated in the attached order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Pizzo on 9/30/2013. (ACS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
