John Hancock Life Insurance Company (USA) v. Schmahl et al
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (USA) |
Marjorie A. Douglass, Annabelle E. Larson and Kathleen Schmahl |
8:2012cv00754 |
April 9, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Tampa Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Mary S. Scriven |
Thomas G. Wilson |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 77 JUDGMENT in favor of Annabelle E. Larson, Marjorie A. Douglass Signed by Deputy Clerk on 11/21/2014. (JNB) |
Filing 76 ORDER granting 74 Motion for summary judgment. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Annabelle E. Larson, individually, and Marjorie A. Douglass, individually and as successor trustee of the Marjorie E. Larson Irrevocable Trust of 1989 and the Marjorie E. Larson Irrevocable Family Trust of 1989, on their cross claim (Doc. 29); the Clerk is to disburse the funds retained in the court's registry in connection with this matter to Marjorie Douglass, as successor trustee of the Marjorie E. Larson Irrevocable Trust of 1989 and the Marjorie E. Larson Irrevocable Family Trust of 1989; and the Clerk shall CLOSE the case.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 11/20/2014. (CAW) |
Filing 65 ORDER granting 51 motion to dismiss and Schmahl's amended crossclaim is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to a claim.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 8/6/2014. (CAW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.