Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Newton
| Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation |
| Jeanne Newton |
| 8:2012cv01445 |
| June 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Elizabeth A. Jenkins |
| James S. Moody |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
60-DAY ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Any pending motions are denied as moot. Clerk shall close the file. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 12/16/2013. (LN)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER: Defendant's Amended Motion to Consolidate 46 is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to consolidate case number 8:12-cv-1883-T-30AEP into the above-referenced case. The Clerk is directed to assign Magistrate Judge Anthony Porcelli to the above-referenced case for all further proceedings. The mediation scheduled on December 13, 2013, shall take place before mediator Roger Benson as per Dkt. #45. The Parties may file a Motion to continue the mediation for the Court's consideratio n if all of the parties are unable to attend the mediation as scheduled. The hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Proper Responses and Responsive Documents to Production of Documents 57 scheduled before Magistrate Judge Anthony Porcelli on Wednesday, December 4, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom #10A shall remain on the Court's calendar unless otherwise directed by Judge Porcelli. The Clerk is directed to administratively close case number 8:12-cv-1883-T-30AEP. The Clerk shall k eep the pending motions filed at 57 59 in case number 8:12-cv-1883-T-30AEP pending. No further filings shall be made in said case. All filings, including responses to 57 and 59 shall be hereafter made in the above-styled case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 11/21/2013. (LN)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER denying without prejudice 36 Motion to Consolidate Cases. Denied without prejudice to file an amended motion demonstrating good cause for extending the joinder cut-off deadline, stating sufficient facts to support consolidation, and including a memorandum of law support of the motion. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 10/3/2013. (LN)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses 7 is granted in part and denied in part as stated herein. Defendant's second, fifth, seventh, ninth, and sixteenth affirmative defenses are stricken. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 8/9/2012. (LN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Newton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation | |
| Represented By: | William L. Yanger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jeanne Newton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
