Scharrer et al v. Fundamental Administrative Services, LLC et al
| Beth Ann Scharrer and Trans Health Management, Inc. |
| Fundamental Administrative Services, LLC, Christine Zack and Kristi Anderson |
| 8:2012cv01855 |
| August 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Mark A. Pizzo |
| James S. Moody |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
ORDER denying 75 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice on Behalf of Defendants Fundamental Administrative Services, LLC and Christine Zack. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 1/10/2014. (LN)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER: The Motion to Dismiss on Behalf of Defendant Fundamental Administrative Services, LLC 49 and Motion of Defendant, Christine Zack, to Dismiss Amended Complaint 50 is GRANTED. Defendant Fundamental Administrative Services, LLC's Motio n to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs' Opposition 64 and Motion of Defendant, Christine Zack, to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Amended Complaint 65 are DENIED as moot. Per t he Florida Supreme Court's opinion in Goldberg v. Merrill Lynch Credit Corp., this case is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiffs may seek a determination from the Florida Supreme Court pursuant to the advisory opinion procedures of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar within 60 days from the date of this Order. If Plaintiffs fail to initiate the process for seeking such an advisory opinion within 60 days, dismissal shall be with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case and deny any pending motions as moot. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 7/30/2013. (LN)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER: The Motion of Defendant, Christine Zack, to Dismiss Complaint 23 , the Motion to Dismiss on Behalf of Defendant Fundamental Administrative Services, LLC 24 , and the Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Kristi Anderson 27 are GRANTED. This cas e is dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiffs to amend within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order to state a cause of action for the unauthorized practice of law that would establish personal jurisdiction over the Defendants. If Plaintiffs fail to file an amended complaint within twenty (20) days, this Court may close this case without further notice. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 11/27/2012. (LN)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER: The Motion of Defendant, Christine Zack, to Dismiss Complaint 23 , the Motion to Dismiss on Behalf of Defendant Fundamental Administrative Services, LLC 24 , and the Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Kristi Anderson 27 are GRANTED. Plaintif fs' Motion to Compel Jurisdictional Depositions of Defendants, Christine Zack and Kristi Anderson, and for Enlargement of Time to Supplement Jurisdictional Argument in Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss 33 , Emergen cy Motion by Defendant Fundamental Administrative Services, LLC for Protective Order 38 , Defendant Kristi Anderson's Motion for Protective Order 41 , and Defendants Fundamental Administrative Services, LLC, Kristi Anderson and Christine Zack& #039;s Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support of Their Motions to Dismiss; Request for Hearing 42 are DENIED as moot. A written order detailing the reasons for the Court's decision will follow shortly. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 11/21/2012. (LN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
