Chartis Property & Casualty Company et al v. Jassy et al
Chartis Property & Casualty Company and American Home Assurance Company |
John D. Jassy, Karen K. Jassy and Jason Kuhn |
8:2012cv02087 |
September 14, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Tampa Office |
Hillsborough |
Mark A. Pizzo |
James S. Moody |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 ORDER: Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment 30 is granted. Defendants John D. Jassy and Karen K. Jassy's Dispositive Motion for Summary Judgment 53 is denied. Defendants Jason Kuhn and Courtney McDermott's Cross-Motion for S ummary Judgment 45 is denied. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against the Defendants. All pending motions are denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to close this file. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 11/4/2013. (LN) |
Filing 29 ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Partial Stay 28 is GRANTED. This action is stayed as to the Plaintiffs' duty to indemnify claims until the resolution of the pending state court action. The parties shall file a motion to lift the stay and attach a final judgment order upon resolution of the state court action. The parties shall proceed, however, on the duty to defend claims. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 1/30/2013. (LN) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.