Howse v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al
| Torm Howse |
| National Abortion Federation, Center for Reproductive Rights, National Network of Abortion Funds, NARAL Pro-Choice America, Choice USA, National Organization for Women, EMILY's List, Feminist Majority Foundation, Family Planning Councils of America and Planned Parenthood Federation of America |
| USA |
| 8:2012cv02519 |
| November 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Pasco |
| Anthony E. Porcelli |
| Elizabeth A. Kovachevich |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER denying 43 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 43 Motion for Reconsideration re 41 Order on Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint; denying 43 Motion for Recusal; denying 43 Motion to Vacate 41 Order on Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 7/22/2013. (JM)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER denying as moot 5 Motion ; denying as moot 16 Motion ; denying as moot 19 Motion ; denying as moot 20 Motion, and dismissing Verified Complaint without prejudice, granting leave to file an amended complaint within fourteen days. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 11/26/2012. (JM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
