USA v. Freelund

Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Jacob A. Freelund
Case Number: 8:2013cv00973
Filed: April 17, 2013
Court: Florida Middle District Court
Office: Tampa Office
County: Hillsborough
Presiding Judge: Virginia M. Hernandez Covington
Referring Judge: Anthony E. Porcelli
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery Student Loan
Cause of Action: 28:1345 USA Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 16, 2013 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 9 the Government's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment against Defendant in the amount of $16,324.97. This judgment shall bear interest at the rate prescribed by 28 U.S.C. 1961. The Clerk shall thereafter CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 7/16/2013. (CH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. Freelund
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: USA
Represented By: Steven M. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jacob A. Freelund
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.