McGough v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
| Michael McGough |
| Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections |
| 8:2013cv01083 |
| April 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Pinellas |
| Elizabeth A. Jenkins |
| James S. Moody |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER: Petitioner's construed Rule 59(e) motion 17 is DENIED. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts becausePetitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). And, because Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability, Petitioner is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 11/21/2013. (LN)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER: The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED as time-barred. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and close this case. Because Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability, he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 10/29/2013. (LN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
