Suarez v. The School Board of Hillsborough County, Florida and its employees et al
| Enrique R. Suarez |
| The School Board of Hillsborough County, Florida and its employees, James Goode, John Cobb, Olaniyio Popoola, Matthew Romano, Rosanne Hoit, Johan A. VonAnchen, Mary Frances Luysterburg, Sonja Wilson, Nadine Johnson, Robert Heilmann and David Brown |
| 8:2013cv01238 |
| May 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Hillsborough |
| Elizabeth A. Kovachevich |
| Mark A. Pizzo |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
137
ORDER granting 113 Motion for summary judgment. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment for the Defendants and against thePlaintiff and to close this case. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 6/10/2015. (SN)
|
|
Filing
132
ORDER denying 112 motion for recusal and denying 120 Motion to Reassign Case. The Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Defendants' motion for summary judgment. The Court will allow him twenty days from this date to respond or the Court will resolve the motion without benefit of his response. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 1/15/2015. (SN)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER granting 84 motion to dismiss with prejudice as to the Three Counts (IV, V, X) in the New Second Amended Complaint. This leaves only the discrimination claims stemming from Plaintiff's interactions with Young Creative Science Center (C ounts II and VII), Farnell Middle School (Count III), Robinson High School (Count VI), Riverview High School (Count VIII), Strawberry Crest High School (Count IX), and the School Board regarding theSupervisor/Elementary Generalist position opening (C ount I). The Defendant may refile its Motion for Summary Judgment as to the counts set out above within twenty-five days of this order. After a ruling on the Motion for Summary Judgment, the Court will set pretrial conference and trial dates if necessary. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 10/24/2014. (SN)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 47 motion to dismiss as setout in this order. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before May 29th, 2014. If an amended complaint is not filed by this date, the claims dismissed without prejudic e will be dismissed with prejudice, leaving only the discrimination claims stemming from Plaintiffs interactions with Young Creative Science Center (Counts II and VII), Famell Middle School(Count III), Robinson High School (Count VI), Riverview High School (Count VIII),Strawberry Crest High School (Count IX), and the School Board regarding the Supervisor/Elementary Generalist position opening (Count I). Under this Order, Plaintiff would not be prohibited from bringing claims stemming from the em ployment decisions alluded to in Count X if and when Plaintiff received notice(s) of intent to sue from the EEOC for any of discriminatory acts alleged therein. The Plaintiff is cautioned to not include in an amendedcomplaint any counts or claims that have been dismissed with prejudice by this Order, for example, claims for defamation. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 5/14/2014. (SN)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 24 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 10/16/2013. (JPS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
