Drayton v. Valdez et al

Drayton v. Valdez et al

Plaintiff:	Olivia Denise Drayton
Defendant:	Bank of America Corporation and Theresa Valdez
Case Number:	8:2013cv01554
Filed:	June 14, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office:	Tampa Office
County:	Hillsborough
Presiding Judge:	Susan C Bucklew
Presiding Judge:	Thomas B. McCoun
Nature of Suit:	P.I.: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 14, 2014	Filing 64 ORDER granting in part and deferring in part 54 Defendant's motion to dismiss amended complaint. Defendant's motion is GRANTED to the extent that that counts XXIII, XXIV and XXV are dismissed; otherwise, it is DEFERRED to the extent that it shall be carried with the case on remand. The Clerk is directed to REMAND this case to the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Hillsborough County, Florida, and to close this case. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 3/14/2014. (GMS)
January 10, 2014	Filing 38 ORDER denying 30 Motion to Remand; striking 37 Reply to Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend;granting 33 Motion For Leave to File Amended Complaint; denying as moot 4 Motion to dismiss; denying as moot 23 Motion to dismiss. Plaintiff is directed to file the Amended Complaint by January 14, 2014. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 1/10/2014. (GMS)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 14, 2014

Filing 64 ORDER granting in part and deferring in part 54 Defendant's motion to dismiss amended complaint. Defendant's motion is GRANTED to the extent that that counts XXIII, XXIV and XXV are dismissed; otherwise, it is DEFERRED to the extent that it shall be carried with the case on remand. The Clerk is directed to REMAND this case to the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Hillsborough County, Florida, and to close this case. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 3/14/2014. (GMS)

January 10, 2014

Filing 38 ORDER denying 30 Motion to Remand; striking 37 Reply to Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend;granting 33 Motion For Leave to File Amended Complaint; denying as moot 4 Motion to dismiss; denying as moot 23 Motion to dismiss. Plaintiff is directed to file the Amended Complaint by January 14, 2014. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 1/10/2014. (GMS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Drayton v. Valdez et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation
Represented By:	Marc Thomas Parrino
Represented By:	J. Randolph Liebler
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Theresa Valdez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Olivia Denise Drayton
Represented By:	Ted J. Starr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?