Moore v. GEICO General Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Joshua Moore
Defendant: GEICO General Insurance Company
Case Number: 8:2013cv01569
Filed: June 14, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Tampa Office
County: Polk
Presiding Judge: Susan C Bucklew
Presiding Judge: Anthony E. Porcelli
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 186 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 176 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 7/13/17. (JD)
March 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 170 ORDER denying 166 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 3/13/2017. (JD)
February 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 165 ORDER denying as moot 149 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying as moot 152 Motion for Taxation of Costs; granting 157 Motion for New Trial; denying 158 Motion for Judgment NOV; denying as moot 160 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 161 Motion for Leave to File reply. The parties are directed to file a joint notice by February 28, 2017 informing the Court as to the weeks in which both parties are available for trial. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 2/13/2017. (JD)
October 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 100 ORDER denying 92 Motion to deem affirmative defenses as general denials. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 10/24/2016. (JD)
September 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 72 GEICO's Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 73 Motion in Limine; granting 74 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 75 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 76 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 9/30/2016. (JD)
August 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 50 Motion for Taxation of Costs. The Court awards GEICO $12,617.30 in costs. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 8/19/2014. (JD)
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER denying 32 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 33 Defendant's Motion for summary judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant, terminate all pending motions, and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 6/30/2014. (JD)
August 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting 7 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice, and he is granted leave to file an amended complaint by August 9, 2013. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 8/1/2013. (JD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. GEICO General Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua Moore
Represented By: Gavin David Magaziner
Represented By: Kerry C. McGuinn, Jr.
Represented By: Michael S. Rywant
Represented By: Kim Edwin Wells
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEICO General Insurance Company
Represented By: Adam A. Duke
Represented By: Michael Justin Lusko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?