Zurich Services Corporation v. Professional Management Services Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Zurich Services Corporation
Defendant: Professional Management Services Group, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2013cv01896
Filed: July 23, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Tampa Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth A. Jenkins
Presiding Judge: James S. Moody
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 155 ORDER: Plaintiff Zurich Services Corporation's Uncontested Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs 154 is granted. The Clerk of Court shall enter a final judgment in Plaintiff's favor and against Defendant in the amount of $76,347.70 which represents costs and attorney's fees. This amount shall accrue postjudgment interest at the Federal statutory rate. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 12/22/2016. (LN)
November 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 142 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation 137 is adopted, confirmed, and approved in part and rejected in part. Specifically, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in all respects and the Report and Recommendation is made a part of this Or der for all purposes, including appellate review, with the exceptions as explained herein with respect to the Magistrate Judge's conclusion (and related findings) that Plaintiff is not entitled to summary judgment on Counts I and II. Plaintiff& #039;s Dispositive Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 105 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law with respect to Counts I, II, and III of the Supplemental Complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a Final Judgm ent in Plaintiff's favor and against Defendants Professional Management Services Group, Inc. F/K/A PEO Management Group, Inc., Staffing Concepts National, Inc., and Executive Management Group, Inc. with respect to Counts I, II, and III of the Su pplemental Complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case and terminate any pending motions as moot. The Court reserves jurisdiction for a period of one (1) year from the date of this Order to enter further orders as necessary to allow Plaintiff to attach and execute on the funds and notes. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 11/15/2016. (LN)
April 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #80) of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects. Plaintiff's Motion to Commence Proceedings Supplementary and to Implead Third Parties into Proceedings (Dkt. #70) i s GRANTED to the extent outlined in this Order. (See Order for details.) Plaintiff's request for attorneys' fees and costs associated with the proceeding supplementary is DENIED without prejudice to reassert at the appropriate time. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 4/30/2015. (LN)
September 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER: Garnishee, Bank of America's Statutory Demand for Attorney's Fees Deposit 42 is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to immediately disburse the $100.00 filing fee deposit to Bank of America c/o Ana M. Jhones, Esq., Haley & Jhones, P.A., 1500 San Remo Avenue, Suite 222, Coral Gables, FL 33146 and close this file. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 9/22/2014. (LN)
May 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER: Plaintiff Zurich Services Corporation's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs (Dkt. 34) is granted in part and denied in part as explained herein. The Clerk of Court shall enter a final judgment in Plaintiff's favor and against Defendant in the amount of $45,492.10 which represents costs and attorney's fees. This amount shall accrue postjudgment interest at the Federal statutory rate. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 5/28/2014. (LN)
April 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 24) is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a final judgment in the amount of $590, 539 in Plaintiff's favor and against Defendant. This amount shall accrue interes t at the federal statutory rate. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. The Court reserves jurisdiction on the amount of Plaintiff's attorney's fees and costs. Any motion for attorney's fees and costs shall be filed within fourteen (14) days of this Order. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 4/17/2014. (LN)
September 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for More Definite Statement 9 is DENIED. Defendant shall file an answer to the complaint within 14 days. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 9/4/2013. (LN)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zurich Services Corporation v. Professional Management Services Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zurich Services Corporation
Represented By: Elizabeth Joy Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Professional Management Services Group, Inc.
Represented By: Mark Monroe Barber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?