Moon et al v. Medical Technology Associates, Inc.
Alfred Moon, Alfred Moon, Jr., Cheryl Moon and Megan White |
Medical Technology Associates, Inc. |
Medical Technology Associates, Inc. |
Alfred Moon, Alfred Moon, Jr., Megan White and Cheryl Moon |
8:2013cv02782 |
October 29, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Tampa Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Elizabeth A. Jenkins |
Elizabeth A. Kovachevich |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 129 ORDER denying 104 Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment due to the existence of disputed material facts for each issue raised. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 3/17/2015. (rjm) |
Filing 125 ORDER that MTA's request for preliminary injunction is DENIED and further denying as moot 122 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 1/30/2015. (SN) |
Filing 72 ORDER denying 64 Counter-Defendants' Motion for Recusal. See Order for further details. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 10/17/2014. (rjm) |
Filing 50 ORDER denying 48 motion to stay. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 3/19/2014. (SN) |
Filing 35 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 8 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 2/18/2014.(rjm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.