United States of America v. Marafiote

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Florida Middle District United States of America v. Marafiote

United States of America v. Marafiote

Petitioner:	USA
Respondent:	Clay Watkins Marafiote
Case Number:	8:2013mc00062
Filed:	August 12, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office:	Tampa Office
County:	Alachua
Presiding Judge:	Virginia M. Hernandez Covington
Presiding Judge:	Thomas B. McCoun
Nature of Suit:	Taxes
Cause of Action:	Petition to Enforce IRS Summons

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 7, 2014	Filing 16 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Thomas B. McCoun, III, United States Magistrate Judge 14 is ADOPTED. The Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue Service Summons 1 is GRANTED. Clay Watkins Marafiote shall appear before Revenue A gent Vivene Gayle-Paul, or any other designated officer of the Internal Revenue Service, at such date, time, and place hereafter fixed by Revenue Agent Gayle-Paul, or her designee, to give testimony and produce for examination and copying the books, papers, records, and other data as demanded by the summons. Failure to timely and completely comply with the terms of this Order may lead to the initiation of contempt proceedings or the arrest of Clay Watkins Marafiot e. The United States shall recover its costs in maintaining this action. The Clerk is directed to enter a final judgment in favor of the Internal Revenue Service and, thereafter, CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 1/7/2014. (KNC)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 7, 2014

Filing 16 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Thomas B. McCoun, III, United States Magistrate Judge 14 is ADOPTED. The Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue Service Summons 1 is GRANTED. Clay Watkins Marafiote shall appear before Revenue A gent Vivene Gayle-Paul, or any other designated officer of the Internal Revenue Service, at such date, time, and place hereafter fixed by Revenue Agent Gayle-Paul, or her designee, to give testimony and produce for examination and copying the books, papers, records, and other data as demanded by the summons. Failure to timely and completely comply with the terms of this Order may lead to the initiation of contempt proceedings or the arrest of Clay Watkins Marafiot e. The United States shall recover its costs in maintaining this action. The Clerk is directed to enter a final judgment in favor of the Internal Revenue Service and, thereafter, CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 1/7/2014. (KNC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Marafiote
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Clay Watkins Marafiote
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: USA
Represented By:	John F. Rudy, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?