Pinkston v. University of South Florida Board of Trustees et al
| Rachel Pinkston |
| University of South Florida Board of Trustees, Randy Larsen, David Merkler and Matthew Battistini |
| 8:2015cv01724 |
| July 24, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Palm Beach |
| Virginia M. Hernandez Covington |
| Thomas B. McCoun |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
277
ORDER: Pro se Plaintiff Rachel Pinkston's "Motion to Chief District Judge Merryday for Reconsideration and to Clarify Order" (Doc. # 275 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 11/15/2018. (DMD)
|
|
Filing
221
ORDER: Pinkston's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. # 210 ), which the Court construes as an objection pursuant to Rule 72(a), is overruled. Pinkston's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. # 216 ), which the Court construes as a Rule 41 (a)(2) motion for voluntary dismissal, is granted. Count II of the Second Amended Complaint, which is the sole remaining Count in this action, is dismissed without prejudice subject to the condition set forth in the Order. Defendants' pending motions to dismiss (Doc. ## 144 , 206 ) are denied as moot. See Order for details. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 7/19/2016. (DRW)
|
|
Filing
202
ORDER: Plaintiff Rachel Pinkston's objections (Doc. # 184 ) are overruled. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 174 ) is accepted and adopted. Pinkston's construed motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. # 160 ) is denied. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/15/2016. (DRW)
|
|
Filing
200
ORDER: Plaintiff Rachel Pinkston's "Motion for Reconsideration and De Novo Review by the Presiding Federal District Court Judge of Order (Doc. No. 173 ) entered by the Presiding Federal District Magistrate Judge" (Doc. # 182 ), filed on May 31, 2016, which the Court construes as an objection filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), is overruled. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/13/2016. (DRW)
|
|
Filing
198
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 166 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 167 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/9/2016. (DRW)
|
|
Filing
161
Rachel Pinkston's Motion for Temporary Injunction (Doc. # 160 ) is DENIED to the extent it seeks the entry of a temporary restraining order. Rachel Pinkston's Motion for Temporary Injunction (Doc. # 160 ), to the extent it may be construed as a motion for preliminary injunction, is referred to Judge McCoun for a Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 4/25/2016. (BLB)
|
|
Filing
155
ORDER: Plaintiff shall, by April 19, 2016, deliver to the undersigned's chambers, and serve upon counsel for Defendants, a doctor's note or a statement signed by a hospital representative, verifying the date and the duration of each parent's hospitalization. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 4/14/2016. (BLB)
|
|
Filing
143
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 91 ) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. Defendants' Motion to Involuntarily Dismiss Plaintiff's Civil Action with Prejudice (Doc. # 49 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 3/29/2016. (BLB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
