Bugoni v. Frank et al
| Piero A. Bugoni |
| Pat Frank, Lawrence Lefler and Mark Ober |
| 8:2015cv01800 |
| August 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Hillsborough |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Julie S. Sneed |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
OPINION AND ORDER. 1. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is DISMISSED. 2. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and close this case. 3. Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, Petitioner is hereby DENI ED a certificate of appealability because he cannot show "that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of denial of a constitutional right, and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether th e district court was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 478 (2000). Pursuant to Rule 22(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Petitioner may request issuance of a certificate of appealability from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Finally, because Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability, he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 8/6/2015. (BGS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
