Conley v. State of Florida et al
Paul Ryan Conley |
State of Florida, 6th Judicial Circuit Court, Pinellas County Sheriff's Office, City of Largo, Florida, Department of Children and Families, City of Largo Police Department, Officer Jenkins, Frank Quesada and Jason Christopher Sanders |
8:2015cv02820 |
December 9, 2015 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Tampa Office |
Pinellas |
Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
Elizabeth A. Jenkins |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER: 1. Conley's Objections 13 are OVERRULED. 2. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 12 is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects, and is made a part of this Order for all purposes, including appellate r eview. 3. Conley's Motion for Relief from the Obligation to Pay the Docketing and Filing Fees, construed as a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal 11 is DENIED. 4. The Court certifies that Conley's appeal is not tak en in good faith and that Conley is not permitted to proceed on his appeal in forma pauperis. Conley must pay the appellate filing fee. 5. The Court cautions Conley that it will not hesitate to impose sanctions should he submit any additional filings containing vexatious or abusive language. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 6/6/2016. (BGS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.