Debose v. USF Board of Trustees et al
| Angela Debose |
| USF Board of Trustees, USF Academic Affairs of USF, Student Success of USF and Paul Dosal |
| 8:2015mc00018 |
| February 4, 2015 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Hillsborough |
| Elizabeth A. Kovachevich |
| Mark A. Pizzo |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER granting 53 Motion for Reconsideration and the motion to continue the July 26, 2015 hearing on preliminary injunction is granted and the hearing is rescheduled for September 25, 2015, at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 14A of the Sam Gibbons Federal Courthouse, 801 N. Florida Avenue, Tampa, Florida. The Court has reserved two hours on the calendar for the hearing. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 6/23/2015. (SN)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER denying 5 Motion for temporary restraining order and denying 6 Motion to Seal as set out in the order. The Court converts the motion for temporary restraining order to a motion for preliminary injunction and will consider the motion after proper service is effectuated and the Court has been noticed appropriately. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 2/13/2015. (SN)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER denying 1 Motion for temporary restraining order without prejudice to file a second, amended motion on or before February 13, 2015. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 2/5/2015. (SN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
