Gregory et al v. City of Tarpon Springs et al
Warren Gregory and Michelle Gregory |
City of Tarpon Springs, Tarpon Springs Police Department and Steve Gassen |
8:2016cv00237 |
January 29, 2016 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Tampa Office |
Pinellas |
Virginia M. Hernandez Covington |
Anthony E. Porcelli |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 ORDER: Defendants City of Tarpon Springs and Officer Gassen's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 55) is granted. Gregory's Third Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and thereafter close this case. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 12/8/2016. (DMD) |
Filing 48 ORDER: Defendants City of Tarpon Springs and Steve Gassen's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Alternatively, Defendants' Motion for a More Definite Statement (Doc. # 44 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff Warren Gregory may file a Third Amended Complaint by October 14, 2016, failing which, the Court will dismiss the case. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 10/5/2016. (DMD) |
Filing 33 ORDER: Defendants' Motion for a More Definite Statement (Doc. # 19 ) is granted. Plaintiffs Warren Gregory and Michelle Gregory may file an amended complaint by June 6, 2016. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/23/2016. (DRW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.