Norton v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Florida Middle District Norton v. Commissioner of Social Security

Norton v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Dwayne Norton
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	8:2016cv02599
Filed:	September 9, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office:	Tampa Office
County:	Hillsborough
Presiding Judge:	Anthony E. Porcelli
Presiding Judge:	James S. Moody
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 19, 2019	Filing 58 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 55) of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this order for all purposes, including appellate review. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judg ment (Dkt. 52) is DENIED. As no issues remain, and all relief available to Plaintiff has been denied, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the Commissioner and close this case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 7/19/2019. (SMB)
February 26, 2019	Filing 41 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 40 ) of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this order for all purposes, including appellate review. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 35 ) is DENIED. The Magistrate Judge shall enter a scheduling order directing the parties to expedite the briefing related to any remaining issue(s) in the case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 2/26/2019. (SMB)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 19, 2019

Filing 58 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 55) of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this order for all purposes, including appellate review. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judg ment (Dkt. 52) is DENIED. As no issues remain, and all relief available to Plaintiff has been denied, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the Commissioner and close this case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 7/19/2019. (SMB)

February 26, 2019

Filing 41 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 40 ) of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this order for all purposes, including appellate review. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 35 ) is DENIED. The Magistrate Judge shall enter a scheduling order directing the parties to expedite the briefing related to any remaining issue(s) in the case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 2/26/2019. (SMB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Norton v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dwayne Norton
Represented By:	Michael Alan Steinberg
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?