People For The Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Dade City's Wild Things, Inc. et al
Plaintiff:
People For The Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.
Defendant:
Dade City's Wild Things, Inc., Stearns Zoological Rescue & Rehab Center, Inc., Kathryn P. Stearns and Randall E. Stearns
Counter_claimant:
Randall E. Stearns, Kathryn P. Stearns and Stearns Zoological Rescue & Rehab Center, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
People For The Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.
Case Number:
8:2016cv02899
Filed:
October 12, 2016
Court:
Florida Middle District Court
Office:
Tampa Office
County:
XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:
Charlene Edwards Honeywell
Referring Judge:
Amanda Arnold Sansone
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:
16:1538
Jury Demanded By:
None
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| July 12, 2017 | 63 |
ORDER taking under advisement 39 Motion to Compel Defendant to Produce Documents and Better Answers to Plaintiff's First Requests for Production of Documents and Interrogatories; granting 56 Motion to Compel Entry Upon Land and Site Inspection; denying without prejudice 57 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 7/12/2017. (BEE)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
