Alvarado v. Featured Mediation, LLC et al
| Benjamin Alvarado |
| Featured Mediation, LLC and Richard C. Corica |
| 8:2016cv03259 |
| November 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Hillsborough |
| Julie S. Sneed |
| James S. Moody |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs 17 is granted to the extent described herein. Plaintiff is entitled to recover $2,810 in fees and $490 in costs. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of $3,300. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 6/8/2017. (LN)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment 13 is granted. Plaintiff is entitled to damages of $1,500.00 for violations of the TCPA, as well as reasonable attorney's fees and costs. Plaintiff shall file documentation in sup port of his request for attorney's fees and costs within fourteen (14) days of this Order. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of $1,500.00, which shall accrue post-judgment interest at the legal rate until paid in full. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and close this case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 5/1/2017. (LN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
