Allen v. MK Centennial Maritime B.V. et al
Priscilla Allen |
MK Centennial Maritime B.V., MMS Co., LTD. and John Doe |
8:2017cv02338 |
October 5, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Tampa Office |
Hillsborough |
Virginia M. Hernandez Covington |
Julie S. Sneed |
Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER: The parties' Joint Motion for Extension of Deadlines and Motion for Pretrial Conference (Doc. # 31 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Clerk is directed to issue an Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/1/2018. (KAK) |
Filing 32 ORDER: The Court requests that the Magistrate Judge hold a hearing on the parties' Joint Motion for Extension of Deadlines and Motion for Pretrial Conference (Doc. # 31 ) in May of 2018, to address the concerns raised herein. The Court defers ruling on the Motion until after the Magistrate Judge holds the hearing. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/16/2018. (KAK) |
Filing 27 ORDER: Plaintiff Priscilla Allen's Motion to Strike Defendants' Affirmative Defenses, or Alternatively, for More Definite Statement (Doc. # 25 ) is GRANTED to the extent the Court Strikes the sixth and seventh Defenses. The Motion is otherwise DENIED. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 1/24/2018. (KAK) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.