Machado et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
Liubert Machado and Ileana Acosta |
Bank of America, N.A. |
8:2017cv02531 |
October 30, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Tampa Office |
Hillsborough |
Virginia M. Hernandez Covington |
Amanda Arnold Sansone |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 ORDER: Defendant Bank of America, N.A.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 47 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice because the Court lacks jurisdiction under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. After entering judgment, the Clerk is directed to terminate all pending deadlines and motions and, thereafter, CLOSE the case. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 10/17/2018. (DMD) |
Filing 46 ORDER: Defendant Bank of America, N.A.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 39 ) is DENIED as premature. Bank of America may file another motion for summary judgment after the close of discovery. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 8/2/2018. (DMD) |
Filing 37 ORDER: Defendant Bank of America's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Doc. # 33 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Bank of America is directed to file an answer to the surviving claim within 14 days. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/15/2018. (AHG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.