Fifth Third Bank v. Ratterman
Plaintiff: Fifth Third Bank
Defendant: Douglas E. Ratterman
Case Number: 8:2017mc00125
Filed: November 9, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Tampa Office
County: Alachua
Presiding Judge: Charlene Edwards Honeywell
Referring Judge: Amanda Arnold Sansone
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2017 Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Mailing Documents by Fifth Third Bank. (CTR)
November 9, 2017 Filing 1 REGISTRATION of Foreign Judgment(for the Western District of Kentucky, case number: 3:16-cv-140-DJH-DW) (Filing fee $ 46.00 receipt number TPA047000) filed by Fifth Third Bank. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(CTR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fifth Third Bank v. Ratterman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas E. Ratterman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fifth Third Bank
Represented By: Nicolette Corso Vilmos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?