Vergara v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Douglas Edward Vergara
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 8:2018cv01141
Filed: May 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Tampa Office
County: Sarasota
Presiding Judge: Charlene Edwards Honeywell
Presiding Judge: Amanda Arnold Sansone
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER: (1) The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 34 is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. (2) Plaintiff's Unopposed Petition a nd Memorandum in Support for Reasonable Attorney's Fees Pursuant to 41 U.S.C. § 406(b) 31 is GRANTED to the extent set forth below. (3) Plaintiff's counsel, Carol Avard, is awarded $34,520.45 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b ), minus the $8,070.50 already received by counsel as EAJA fees. The net award of $26,449.95 shall be paid to counsel from the past-due benefits withheld. To the extent the withheld funds are insufficient to pay the net award, Ms. Avard may follow the appropriate administrative procedures to recover the outstanding amount. (4) The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. (5) This file shall remain closed. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 4/29/2021. (BGS)
August 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER: (1) The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 24 is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and APPROVED in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. (2) The final decision of the Commissione r is REVERSED. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings as follows: A) Reconsider all of the opinions of Dr. Hershkowitz and Dr. Jen; state with particularity the weight afforded and the reasons why; if discounted, provide good cause; (B) Adequately reflect consideration of the alleged side effects of Plaintiff's medications; and (C) Take such other action as may be necessary to resolve this matter properly. (3 ) Plaintiff's counsel is directed that, in the event benefits are awarded on remand, counsel shall ensure that any § 406(b) fee application be filed within the parameters set forth by the Order entered in Case No. 6:12-mc-124-Orl-22 (In Re : Procedures for Applying for Attorney's Fees Under 42 U.S.C. §§ 406(b) and 1383(d)(2)). (4)The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions, enter a judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and close this case. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 8/21/2019. (BGS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vergara v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Douglas Edward Vergara
Represented By: Carol Ann Avard
Represented By: Mark V. Zakhvatayev
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?