Carrero v. United States of America

Carrero v. United States of America

Plaintiff:	Marino Porto Carrero
Defendant:	United States of America
Case Number:	8:2018cv01720
Filed:	July 16, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office:	Tampa Office
County:	Hillsborough
Presiding Judge:	James S Moody
Referring Judge:	Thomas G Wilson
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
August 1, 2018	Filing 2 ORDER: The Government shall show cause within SIXTY (60) DAYS from the date of this Order why the relief sought in the motion should not be granted. Petitioner shall mail one copy of every pleading, exhibit and/or correspondence, along with a certificate of service indicating the date an accurate copy was mailed, to the Government attorney listed as counsel of record in this case. Should Petitioner fail to include the required certificate of service, the Clerk of this Court is directed to reject the document for filing and return the document without action. Petitioner shall advise the Court of any change of address. Failure to do so will result in the case being dismissed for failure to prosecute. Petitioner may have THIRTY (30) DAYS after the date the Government files its response to file a reply thereto. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 8/1/2018. (SMB)
July 16, 2018	Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) Criminal Case No. 8:11-cr-196-T-30TGW filed by Marino Porto Carrero. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(BSN)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 1, 2018

Filing 2 ORDER: The Government shall show cause within SIXTY (60) DAYS from the date of this Order why the relief sought in the motion should not be granted. Petitioner shall mail one copy of every pleading, exhibit and/or correspondence, along with a certificate of service indicating the date an accurate copy was mailed, to the Government attorney listed as counsel of record in this case. Should Petitioner fail to include the required certificate of service, the Clerk of this Court is directed to reject the document for filing and return the document without action. Petitioner shall advise the Court of any change of address. Failure to do so will result in the case being dismissed for failure to prosecute. Petitioner may have THIRTY (30) DAYS after the date the Government files its response to file a reply thereto. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 8/1/2018. (SMB)

July 16, 2018

Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) Criminal Case No. 8:11-cr-196-T-30TGW filed by Marino Porto Carrero. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(BSN)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carrero v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By:	Joseph K. Ruddy
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marino Porto Carrero
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?