Mohit v. City of Haines City
Benedict Mohit |
City of Haines City |
8:2018cv01775 |
July 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Tampa Office |
Polk |
Elizabeth A Kovachevich |
Julie S Sneed |
Real Property: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 RETURN of service executed on August 02, 2018 by Benedict Mohit as to City of Haines City. (Mohit, Benedict) |
Filing 11 ENDORSED ORDER directing Defendant City of Haines City to respond to #10 Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend on or before 9/19/2018. The court is not unmindful that Plaintiff is proceeding pro se. However, Plaintiff is nevertheless subject to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this District. Plaintiff's motion fails to comply with Local Rule 3.01(g). Plaintiff is hereby reminded of his duty to confer with counsel for the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve the issues raised by any future motions before filing the same with the Court. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 9/5/2018. (RLH) |
Filing 10 MOTION for leave to file Amended Complaint by Benedict Mohit. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Mohit, Benedict) |
Filing 9 TERMINATED, counsel to refile CERTIFICATE of service by Benedict Mohit via Steve Bahamondes. (Mohit, Benedict) Modified text on 9/5/2018 (LNR). |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Additional Appearance by Kayla Elizabeth Platt Rady on behalf of City of Haines City (Platt Rady, Kayla) |
Filing 7 ENDORSED ORDER granting #3 motion for CM/ECF access. The Clerk is directed to issue Plaintiff a CM/ECF account (login and password). Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 8/23/2018. (RLH) |
Filing 6 MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim by City of Haines City. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit)(Edwards, Linda) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - Track 2 issued by Deputy Clerk on 7/24/2018. (SRC) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 7/15/2008. (LNR) |
Filing 3 MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically Permission for electronic case filing by Benedict Mohit. (LNR) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to City of Haines City. (LNR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Haines City (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number TPA51980) filed by Benedict Mohit. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-E, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Mailing Envelope)(LNR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mohit v. City of Haines City | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Benedict Mohit | |
Represented By: | Benedict Mohit |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: City of Haines City | |
Represented By: | Kayla Elizabeth Platt Rady |
Represented By: | Linda Bond Edwards |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.