Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Bryan J. Smith
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 8:2018cv02049
Filed: August 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Charlene Edwards Honeywell
Referring Judge: Christopher P Tuite
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2018 Filing 8 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (CTR)
September 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge #6 is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. Plaintiff's construed motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is DENIED. Plaintiff is directed to pay the filing fee within twenty (20) days of the date of this order. Failure to pay the filing fee within the allotted time will result in dismissal of this action without further notice. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 9/17/2018. (BGS)
September 7, 2018 FEES paid by Bryan J. Smith (Filing fee $400.00 receipt number TPA052926) (EA)
August 29, 2018 Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: #2 construed Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed by Bryan J. Smith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 8/29/2018. (AMM)
August 23, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Bryan J. Smith. Related case(s): no (Avard, Carol)
August 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 9/4/2018. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 8/20/2018. (BGS)
August 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/2010. (CTR)
August 17, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bryan J. Smith. (CTR) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite.
August 17, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Bryan J. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(CTR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bryan J. Smith
Represented By: Carol Ann Avard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?