White v. Skate Park of Tampa et al
| Steven C. White |
| Anthony Drew Love, State Park of Tampa, Andrew Reynolds, Skate Park of Tampa and Baker Skateboard Company |
| 8:2018cv02050 |
| August 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Virginia M Hernandez Covington |
| Sean P Flynn |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Steven C. White. Related case(s): no. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(DG) |
Filing 4
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn on 8/31/2018. (CKR)
|
|
Filing 3
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 8/22/2018. (TWL)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency by Steven C. White. (KMM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Anthony Drew Love, Andrew Reynolds, Skate Park of Tampa, Baker Skateboard Company filed by Steven C. White. (Attachments: # 1 Mailing Envelope)(KMM) (KMM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
