Baluha v. Scott et al
Plaintiff: Joseph Baluha
Defendant: Rick Scott, Simon Temple, Lee County Sheriff and Fifth Third Bank
Case Number: 8:2018cv02077
Filed: August 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: James S Moody
Referring Judge: Amanda Arnold Sansone
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #5 ) of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this order for all purposes, including appellate review. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Dkt. #2 ) is DENIED. The Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 10/3/2018. (SMB)
September 17, 2018 Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency filed by Joseph Baluha, #1 Complaint filed by Joseph Baluha. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 9/17/2018. (BEE)
August 23, 2018 Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Issued by Deputy Clerk on 8/23/2018. (AD)
August 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER ruling deferred #2 Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency and directing an amended complaint and affidavit by 9/13/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 8/23/2018. (BEE)
August 21, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency by Joseph Baluha. (LSS) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone.
August 21, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fifth Third Bank, Lee County Sheriff, Rick Scott, Simon Temple filed by Joseph Baluha. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Mailing Envelope)(LSS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baluha v. Scott et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Baluha
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rick Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Simon Temple
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lee County Sheriff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fifth Third Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?