Doe, et al v. The College Board et al
Plaintiff: John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant: The College Board and Educational Testing Service
Case Number: 8:2018cv02172
Filed: August 30, 2018
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Charlene Edwards Honeywell
Referring Judge: Anthony E Porcelli
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2018 Filing 17 Joint MOTION for protective order by Jane Doe, John Doe(on behalf of his minor child, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), John Doe(on behalf of his minor child). (Attachments: #1 Agreed Protective Order)(Criden, Michael) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli.
October 11, 2018 Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Interested persons order by The College Board. (Adar, Yaniv)
October 11, 2018 Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Interested persons order by Educational Testing Service. (Adar, Yaniv)
October 8, 2018 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter Winslow Homer on behalf of Educational Testing Service (Homer, Peter)
October 8, 2018 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter Winslow Homer on behalf of The College Board (Homer, Peter)
October 8, 2018 Filing 12 WAIVER of service returned executed on 09/28/2018 by The College Board as to The College Board. (Homer, Peter)
October 8, 2018 Filing 11 WAIVER of service returned executed on 09/28/2018 by Educational Testing Service as to Educational Testing Service. (Homer, Peter)
October 2, 2018 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of compliance re 8 Order on motion to appear pro hac vice Linda Nussbaum by Jane Doe, John Doe(on behalf of his minor child, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), John Doe(on behalf of his minor child). (Nussbaum, Linda)
September 27, 2018 Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Educational Testing Service, The College Board with Jury Demand. filed by John Doe.(Criden, Michael)
September 21, 2018 ***PRO HAC VICE FEES paid by attorney Linda P. Nussbaum, appearing on behalf of John Doe (Filing fee $150 receipt number TPA053259.) Related document: #6 MOTION for Linda P. Nussbaum to appear pro hac vice. (AG)
September 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ENDORSED ORDER granting #6 motion to appear pro hac vice. Attorney Linda P. Nussbaum may appear pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiff, with Attorney Michael Criden designated as local counsel pursuant to Local Rule 2.02(a). Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, counsel shall comply with the form, fee, and electronic filing requirements and file a notice of compliance with said requirements. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 9/13/2018. (JLN)
September 12, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by John Doe. Related case(s): no (Criden, Michael)
September 12, 2018 Filing 6 MOTION for Linda P. Nussbaum to appear pro hac vice by John Doe. (Criden, Michael) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli.
August 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 9/14/2018. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 8/31/2018. (BGS)
August 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 9/14/2018. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 8/31/2018. (BGS)
August 30, 2018 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to The College Board. (EA)
August 30, 2018 Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to Educational Testing Service. (EA)
August 30, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Educational Testing Service, The College Board with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number TPA052787) filed by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(EA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe, et al v. The College Board et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The College Board
Represented By: Yaniv Adar
Represented By: Peter Winslow Homer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Educational Testing Service
Represented By: Yaniv Adar
Represented By: Peter Winslow Homer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe
Represented By: Michael E. Criden
Represented By: Fred T. Isquit, Jr.
Represented By: Lindsey C. Grossman
Represented By: Linda Phyllis Nussbaum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Represented By: Michael E. Criden
Represented By: Fred T. Isquit, Jr.
Represented By: Lindsey C. Grossman
Represented By: Linda Phyllis Nussbaum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?