Russo v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Tina Russo |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 8:2018cv02332 |
| September 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| James S Moody |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 PROOF of service by Tina Russo (Harris, Suzanne) |
| Filing 7 PROOF of service by Tina Russo (Harris, Suzanne) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS returned executed by Tina Russo. Commissioner of Social Security served on 10/22/2018, answer due 12/21/2018. (Harris, Suzanne) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Tina Russo. Related case(s): No (Harris, Suzanne) |
| Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 1.04(d) - track 1. Issued by Deputy Clerk on 9/25/2018. (AD) |
Filing 3
ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/2010. (BSN)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (BSN) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number tpa 053251) filed by Tina Russo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BSN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
