Jin v. TAIYO International Inc. et al
| Joseph Jin |
| Kil D. Han and TAIYO International Inc. |
| 8:2018cv02342 |
| September 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sean P Flynn |
| James S Moody |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to court interrogatories re: #7 FLSA scheduling order by Joseph Jin. (Saba, Christopher) |
Filing 7
FLSA SCHEDULING ORDER. Plaintiff shall answer the Court's interrogatories within 20 days. (See Order for additional details and instructions.) Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 10/24/2018. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form)(SMB)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by Kil D. Han, TAIYO International Inc..(Donnelly, Paul) |
| Filing 5 RETURN of service executed on September 29, 2018 by Joseph Jin as to Kil D. Han. (Saba, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 RETURN of service executed on September 29, 2018 by Joseph Jin as to TAIYO International Inc.. (Saba, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Kil D. Han. (BSN) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to TAIYO International Inc. (BSN) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kil D. Han, TAIYO International Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number tpa 053266) filed by Joseph Jin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BSN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
