Spradley v. Frank et al
| Glenn Spradley |
| C. Baler, Hillsborough County and Pat Frank |
| 8:2018cv02372 |
| September 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #15 motion for extension of time; granting #16 motion to appear telephonically. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 11/7/2018. (DMP)
|
| Filing 16 MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically to Meet Telephonically by Glenn Spradley. (DG) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to extend time for the parties to meet for the purpose of preparing and filing the case management report by Glenn Spradley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Mailing Envelope)(DG) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Case with prejudice as to Hillsborough County filed by Glenn Spradley. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(DG) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #10 motion for extension of time. Mr. Spradley's response to Hillsborough County's #5 motion to dismiss is due November 2, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 10/22/2018. (DMP)
|
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Interested persons order by Pat Frank. (Gonzalez, Thomas) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Pat Frank. Related case(s): No (Gonzalez, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss Case with prejudice as to Hillsborough County by Glenn Spradley. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(DG) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Interested persons order by Hillsborough County. (Brazel, Robert) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Interested persons order by Glenn Spradley. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(AG) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Glenn Spradley. Related case(s): Yes. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(AG) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #2 Complaint by Pat Frank.(Gonzalez, Thomas) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Case with prejudice as to Hillsborough County by Hillsborough County. (Brazel, Robert) |
|
Filing 4
INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 10/11/2018. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 9/27/2018. (BGS)
|
|
Filing 3
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 10/11/2018. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 9/27/2018. (BGS)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Pat Frank, C. Baler and Hillsborough County filed by Glenn Spradley.(DG) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Hillsborough County, case number 18-CA-008356 Div. I filed in State Court on 5/29/2018. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number TPA-053313 filed by Pat Frank.(Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit State Court Filings, Part 1, #3 Exhibit State Court Filings, Part 2, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(DG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
