Furner v. General Motors Financial Company, Inc.
| Daniel W. Furner |
| General Motors Financial Company, Inc. |
| 8:2018cv02554 |
| October 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| James S Moody |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER re #11 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. This case is dismissed with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own attorney's fees, costs and expenses. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 11/30/2018. (SMB)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice (Joint) by General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (Mitchell, Matthew) Modified text on 12/5/2018 (AG). |
|
Filing 10
60-DAY ORDER OF DISMISSAL re #9 Notice of Settlement. All pending motions, if any, are DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 11/28/2018. (SMB)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of settlement by General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (Mitchell, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on 10/22/2018 by Daniel W. Furner as to General Motors Financial Company, Inc.. (Haas, Raymond) |
|
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER granting #6 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. General Motors Financial Company, Inc.'s answer or response is due by November 27, 2018. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 11/7/2018. (SMB)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by General Motors Financial Company, Inc.. (Mitchell, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 ***TERMINATED-INCORRECT EVENT-COUNSEL TO REFILE AS "SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED"***PROOF of service by Daniel W. Furner (Haas, Raymond) Modified on 11/5/2018 (LSS). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Daniel W. Furner. Related case(s): No (Haas, Raymond) |
| Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Issued by Deputy Clerk on 10/19/2018. (AD) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (EA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against General Motors Financial Company, Inc. with Jury Demand Filing fee $ 400, receipt number TPA053738 filed by Daniel W. Furner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(EA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Furner v. General Motors Financial Company, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: General Motors Financial Company, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Thomas Mitchell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel W. Furner | |
| Represented By: | Chioma H Michel |
| Represented By: | Raymond A. Haas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
