Kellman v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Hillsborough County)
Petitioner: Ralph Donald Kellman
Respondent: Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Case Number: 8:2018cv02640
Filed: October 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: William F Jung
Referring Judge: Anthony E Porcelli
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Scott Tannen on behalf of Secretary, Department of Corrections (Tannen, Jonathan)
December 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER to respond and show cause why the petition should not be granted. Respondent has 90 days to respond. Petitioner has 30 days to reply to the petition response. Clerk is directed to serve the petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 12/17/2018. (Attachments: #1 Service Documents)(RAO)
December 13, 2018 FEES paid by Ralph Donald Kellman (Filing fee $5.00 receipt number TPA054485) (JCG)
December 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion to extend time to pay the filing fee. Petitioner shall pay the $5.00 filing fee no later than December 31, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 12/5/2018. (LV)
November 26, 2018 Filing 5 Construed MOTION to extend time to pay filing fee or file a motion for in forma pauperis by Ralph Donald Kellman. (KMM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli.
November 15, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #2 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Ralph Donald Kellman. Related case(s): no (KMM)
November 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER that Petitioner is to either submit the $5.00 filing fee or complete and file proof of indigency. Filing fee or proof of indigency due by 11/29/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 11/1/2018. (LV)
October 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 10/30/2018. (SAO)
October 26, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus -State. filed by Ralph Donald Kellman. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(KMM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kellman v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Hillsborough County)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General, State of Florida
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections
Represented By: Jonathan Scott Tannen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ralph Donald Kellman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?