Augenti v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Deborah Augenti
Defendant: Merck & Co, Inc., McKesson Corp. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Case Number: 8:2018cv02686
Filed: November 2, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Susan C Bucklew
Referring Judge: Julie S Sneed
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 26, 2018 Filing 8 MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION panel order transferring case to: Eastern District of Pennsylvania; MDL case number: 2848. (JNB)
November 26, 2018 Case transferred from Florida Middle has been opened in Eastern District of Pennsylvania as case 2:18-cv-20160, filed 11/26/2018. (JNB)
November 15, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Deborah Augenti. Related case(s): yes (DeGisi, Carmen)
November 13, 2018 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Deborah Augenti. (DeGisi, Carmen)
November 6, 2018 Filing 5 POSSIBLE MDL Tag Along cases for MDL Case Number 2848, In re: Re: MDL No. 2848 IN RE: Zostavax (Zoster Vaccine Live) Products Liability Litigation. Information emailed to MDL Panel on 11/6/2018. (Attachments: #1 List of Merck Cases filed 11/2/18) (MAA)
November 5, 2018 Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (LSS)
November 2, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - Track 2 (MSS)
November 2, 2018 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Susan C. Bucklew and Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:18-cv-2686-T-24JSS. (NAS)
November 2, 2018 Filing 1 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., McKesson Corp. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-14781621) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Merck Summons, #2 Proposed Summons McKesson Summons, #3 Proposed Summons MSD Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet CIS Augenti)(DeGisi, Carmen) Modified text on 11/5/2018 (LSS).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Augenti v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deborah Augenti
Represented By: Carmen A. DeGisi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merck & Co, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McKesson Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?